PREVIOUS HOME NEXT


SUDLUSITANIAN-TARTESSIAN WRITING




    Though the shape of the signs of the Sudlusitanian inscriptions is very similar to those of the Meridional Iberian's ones, this system is not a semisyllabary, but an alphabet in which every sign is to be transcribed as only one phoneme/letter. There is only one difference with the Greek type alphabet: the occlusive sign is different depending on the following vowel. That is, there is a k sign when followed by an a vowel, other when followed by e and so on. It is as if in an Iberian semisyllabary we added always the respective vowel sign to the syllabic sign: ta-a, te-eti-i, and so on. The cases of absence of vowel after an occlusive sign are exceptional. Obviously such a system was unstable and there are a few inscriptions in which the same sign is used both before a and before e in a clear process of simplification.

    There are also a few inscriptions 'unorthodox' 'anomalous', with odd shape signs and maybe with structural differences, but these inscriptions don't form a group: every one has its own anomalies.

    As regards the sign transcription table below, there are some important points to notice. The transcription of the accented r (r') is conventional, based on the Meridional Iberian value, and it could be a third sibilant. Untermann doesn't accept the identification of ki (k before i), and there are not enough data to demonstrate whether bu actually isn't ku (and hence ku actually bu): I consider it more probable the option stated below, but Correa and Untermann prefer the opposite solution.

MAJOR SIGN FORMS OF SUDLUSITANIAN SCRIPT
(VOCAL=VOWEL ANTE=BEFORE)





THE HETH SHAPED SIGNS:

    One aspect of my reading system that has been unexpectedly overlooked is the interpretation that I suggest for the Sudlusitanian signs that resemble Phoenician 'heth': it wasn't quoted in the brief Untermann's tables, and hence neither by Guerra (who also repeats the tables' mistake that I consider Untermann's m as a variant of s'!!). My proposal is to interpret them according to the following vowel: before a or e I read it as t/d; whereas before o or u as p/b. That said, it should be enough, but I hope that with a drawing it'll be easier to understand.

    So (not exhaustively), respectively before a, and before e, TA and TE:

    Whereas before a back vowel o or u, BO and BU:



PREVIOUS HOME NEXT